
One of our school district administrator's admitted that the district will not fire teachers who do not fulfill the contracted requirements of an unsatisfactory evaluation.
In the past five years, teachers with unsatisfactory evaluations who have not completed their contractual obligations and in effect have been insubordinate for not doing so, have not been let go. In the meantime, young and energetic teachers who have wanted to actually teach in my district, probably one of the toughest anywhere to teach, have been laid off.
I was also asked by this same administrator what the "union" would do about teachers who were refusing to attend mandatory training due to a lawsuit. I politely informed her that if a teacher refused to do something that was mandatory, then again, that's insubordination. It is the district's responsibility as the employer of these teachers to let them know that by refusing to attend, then they were insubordinate and could be subject to being fired.
This administrator looked absolutely amazed by this information.
So, the next time that anyone tells you that teachers' unions protect bad teachers, please remember that some of the time, bad teachers are never fired because administrators don't fully comprehend what it means to be a boss.











